logo SDS
Dnešní datum: 24. 08. 2019   | Hlavní stránka | Tématické skupiny | Seznam rubrik | Download |  
zelené návěští   Hlavní menu zelený nadpis
Hlavní stránka
Kdo jsme - něco o SDS
Stanoviska SDS
Tiskové zprávy SDS
International
Staré stránky SDS

Ankety
Download
TOP 50
Tématické skupiny
Seznam rubrik (témat)

červené návěští   Rubriky červený nadpis

zelené návěští   Čtenář zelený nadpis

Jméno (přezdívka)
Heslo


Úprava osobního účtu

červené návěští   Evropská levice červený nadpis


Na web SEL

Manifest SEL
Čtěte o SEL u nás


zelené návěští   Nejčtenějąí/rok zelený nadpis
Praľské jaro i jeho dozvuky a ohlasy na stránkách SDS
(26. 08. 2018, 779x)

Chinese Reaction to the 1968 Occupation of Czechoslovakia
(10. 09. 2018, 762x)

Sovětská revizionistická renegátská klika bezostyąně posílá jednotky k okupaci Československa
(10. 09. 2018, 679x)

Praha není stádo?
(25. 08. 2018, 676x)

Praľské jaro mohlo prokázat přednosti „socialismu s lidskou tváří“
(12. 09. 2018, 669x)

Socialismus, nový pohled a strategie
(06. 09. 2018, 638x)

Pouľívá generální ątáb naąe vojáky v Afghánistánu v souladu s mandátem operace?
(19. 10. 2018, 528x)

Zástupce SDS v pořadu "Politické spektrum"
(23. 11. 2018, 423x)


červené návěští   SDS červený nadpis
Strana demokratického socialismu
Přípotoční 869/19
101 00 Praha 10
Návątěvy po předchozí dohodě
tel.:
(420) 608 630 506
(420) 608 181 054
(420) 728 074 253 (nejlépe SMS)
Bankovní spojení - transparentní účet pro příjem darů: 2101181284/2010
Případné dárce žľádáme, aby ve "zprávě pro příjemce" uvedli účel daru, např.: "příspěvek na činnost SDS" a identifikovali se jménem a příjmením. Děkujeme.
secret@sds.cz
(c) SDS

Kanál RSS

TOPlist

zelené návěští   Interní statistika zelený nadpis
Denni
Max. 19
Prům. 15.2
21 denni
Max. 403
Prům. 294.7

Nyní si čte web : 45 uživ.

International

* Together for change in Europe!

Vydáno dne 01. 12. 2008 (6262 přečtení)

21st Century Europe needs peace, democracy, social justice and solidarity
Platform of the Party of the European Left for the elections to the European Parliament 2009

I.

The elections to the European Parliament in June 2009 will be an opportunity to change the foundations of the European Union (EU) and to open a new perspective for Europe.

We are facing a financial, economic and social crisis, a crisis of the whole system, which is growing day by day. It is amplifying and worsening the food, energy and ecological crisis. It deepens the gender gap. It has a direct impact on the lives of all people in Europe and the world. Everywhere in the European Union the shock is tremendous. The crisis is caused by neo-liberal globalized capitalism, namely the irresponsible political and economic elites pushing ahead with this hazardous capitalism, whose price shall be paid by the people. It endangers peace, international security and coexistence. The world has been lead into this global crisis by the hegemonic policy of the United States, in particular of the Bush administration.

The crisis is once more demonstrating the failure of neo-liberal globalization, which has maximised the profits of financial market’s main players on a global scale without any state control and intervention. Politics, states and entire societies are subordinated to uncontrolled financial markets. The result is clear: a lack of democracy and the end of the welfare state.

Policies of low wages and precarious labour, as consequences of the deflationary measures applied by the developed countries’ governments, have put the financial and credit system at risk.

Governments, EU institutions and world economic bodies like the IMF, the World Bank and the WTO have imposed privatization and deregulation.

As a result, the neo-liberal foundations of the EU-treaties are called into question, in particular the insistence on an “open market economy with free competition”: the unchecked free circulation of capital, the liberalization and privatization of public services, the status and mission of the European Central Bank.

This historic crisis that strikes the heart of capitalism is challenging us to contribute to the resistance of the peoples, and to open a perspective for change in Europe. The Party of the European Left believes that a way out of this crisis can only be found by fighting for a democratic and social Europe: “A Europe of the people, not of the banks”.

This is also a political crisis. The Irish, French and Dutch No to the Lisbon and the European Constitutional Treaties have shown that an increasing number of people in Europe disagree with the undemocratic and unsocial policies of the European Union. They believe that the EU is a far-off and incomprehensible construction that does not concern them, that ignores their hopes and their actual situation.

We reaffirm our No to the Lisbon treaty. The democratic expression of the people’s will must be respected within a new democratic process, based on active participation by the people and the national and European parliaments. Democratic participation and parliaments’ powers must be strengthened through norms on popular petitions, co-decision enlargement and the relations between national parliaments and the European Parliament. The EU citizens have to discuss and decide on an alternative to the Lisbon Treaty.

The European Union is interfering in the lives of the people of Europe. 15 years after the Maastricht Treaty, neo-liberal orientations prevail: the living and working conditions of the majority of Europe’s population have rapidly worsened: longer working hours, longer working lives, insufficient wages, growing long-term and youth unemployment, mini jobs, temporary employment and unpaid internships are scandalous realities. By and large, public services are used for profits. Along with this come psychological and physical pressure, diseases, fear, loss of solidarity and violence against the weaker elements in society. The situation of migrants in the European Union and its member countries, as well as the EU migration policy, reflect this dramatically. On the other hand, profits have increased tremendously: managers receive astronomic salaries, even when their actions have negative consequences. The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer.

With regard to the recent events in Europe, such as the Caucasus conflict, the developments in Kosovo, the bilateral treaties with the United States on the construction of US military bases in Eastern Europe, and the on-going arms race, it is important for the EU to respect international law and find political solutions to any conflict.

The militarization of EU foreign policy linked to NATO must be replaced by an alternative concept of security based on peace, dialogue and international cooperation.

Many people are disappointed, frustrated by or turning away from European politics. However others are struggling for their jobs and social security, for public services and the right to participate in the political decision-making process. They fight for their political, social and individual rights, for the respect of the human rights of all people living in the EU. Migration and asylum have become an urgent issue in the political struggle. People strive for gender equality and democracy, justice and the right of all people to live in dignity and solidarity with each other.

More than ever the EU is at a crossroads:

  • either the EU continues its current capitalist policy, which is deepening its financial, security, food and energy crisis;
  • or the EU becomes an area of sustainable development and social justice, of peace and mutual cooperation, of the equality of women and men; of democratic participation and solidarity, where antifascism, anti-racism, civil liberties and human rights are common practice.

The choice is in the hands of the people. To overcome resignation or abstention we say: alternatives exist. Policies both at the national and the European levels must and can be changed.

The European Left demands that this Europe must be a peaceful and civil Europe, whose economies are socially and ecologically sustainable, that is feminist and develops on the basis of democracy and solidarity. This needs a new synergy between social and political forces. It requires ideas, initiatives and the hard work of political actors and democratic forces, of trade unions and social movements, of representatives of civil societies. Alternatives are possible – through common struggle both in the streets and in the parliaments.

We are joining the struggle of the peace and anti-war movement, of the anti-globalization movement, of all those resisting precarity of living, the struggles of workers, of women and of the youth.

Together with the representatives of other socialist, communist and Nordic left-green parties we have successfully cooperated within the GUE/NGL group at the European Parliament. The pluralistic character of this group has enriched the creative power of the left opposition between 2004 and 2009. We want to further develop this experience in the newly elected European Parliament.

In light of the current crisis, the European Left is all the more called on to play an effective role in bringing about common political action against the political and cultural hegemony of the Right.

The neo-liberal policies in the EU were possible, among other reasons, because of a kind of great coalition between the parties of the European Conservative forces and the European Socialists. This consensus is one of the reasons for the political crisis in the way Europe functions. It creates big contradictions inside the Social-democratic parties.

The EL competes against conservative and liberal, social-democratic and green parties in the member countries and with the corresponding European political parties, which are sticking to the logic of current European policies. The EL is striving for change and regaining the political space in Europe.

The EL confirms its consequent struggle against any attempt by extreme right and right-populist parties to broaden their influence in Europe.

 

II. Overcome the Crisis: People before Profits

For a Social and Ecological Economy in Europe

The crisis demands a coordinated answer at the international and European level.

The European Left stands for a policy that is based on economic and social development and the protection of the environment. It aims at the defence and development of social achievements. Contrary to the Lisbon strategy, we strive for a strategy sustained on the values of solidarity and cooperation, full employment and a rational relationship with nature. This is possible only by changing the existing rules of the international economic and financial system.

It is necessary to re-found the European Union on the basis of new parameters, able to focus on people and rights before profits.

We stress that the workers should not have to pay for the crisis while banks and finances are saved. The logic of the G7’s plans as for the European Union means privatizing the profits and socializing the losses.

However, even the current legislation is allowing expenditure for an investment plan able to sustain employment, to support the ecological restructuring of the economy.

In matters of financing, the crisis made obvious the determinate part taken by credit. Credit must be redirected to the productive sectors of the economy and the collectivities, to employment, social and environmental priorities, from the cities and the regions to the European Central Bank System. To realize this reorientation of credit and money, we stand for public and social control over the banking and financial system. We stand for the right of the working people and their organizations, as well as the local elected people, to control the use of credits and subsidies.

We criticise the aims and the current policies of the European Central Bank; its absolute independence from any form of political address; the lack of transparency in its decisions and actions. We underline the urgent necessity that its monetary policy must respond to the goals of new economic and employment growth, which are a priority with regards to inflation maintenance.

Therefore the role of the European Central Bank must be changed, in line with the criteria of employment and social and ecological development, by a selective decrease of its interest rates. The ECB must be submitted to public and democratic control. It statutes must be changed. The Growth and Stability Pact must be replaced by a new pact of solidarity, focussing on growth, full employment, social and environmental protection.

We need to tax financial transactions and income in Europe and to abolish tax havens. It is also necessary to introduce taxation for speculative capital in order to feed the creation of a European fund. Capital movements, in particular profits that are not directly linked with investment and trade, must be subjected to control and taxation.

The Tobin tax can be the tool to finance innovative industrial initiatives in the sectors indicated by international UN agencies and aimed at reducing global emissions and increasing the number of jobs. This European fund would have to be submitted to European Parliament’s guidelines and programmes: a sort of “new green deal” of the parliament itself.

The common goods and economic strategy sectors, including the credit and financial system, must be socialised (nationalised) while there is the need to rebuild a general welfare system on a European scale. The privatization of public services must be reversed. We need to raise workers’ wages and incomes. We need to harmonize the European financial system, based on the principle of tax progressiveness.

As for the new rights and powers of the employees and citizens, they should enable them to break with the monopoly of the strategic information and decisions by the main players of the market, and claim them for themselves, to achieve a real transformation of political power. Democracy must begin with the involvement of the citizens themselves and must be extended to every sphere of social life.

Sustainable European standards preventing poverty should replace the current policy of wage, social and environmental dumping. As the rulings of the European Court of Justice represent strong attacks on collective agreements and labour regulations, we stress the necessity to strengthen collective agreements and reinforce workers’ rights. We reject the EU directive that extends working time up to 65 hours per week, allowing total flexibility and boosting the individualization of work. For us, maximum weekly working hours permitted by law, on average, must not exceed 40 hours. All EU regulations and national laws on working hours must be changed accordingly. We struggle for 35 hours per week on a Europe-wide level. Existing better national regulations should be preserved. We demand a European minimum wage that represents at least 60% of the national average wage and does not put at risk the collective agreements.

A minimum income for unemployed people, as well as a minimum pension linked to the minimum wage, and automatically adjusted to the price evolution, is necessary to guarantee a life in dignity. Flexible retirement ages should be guaranteed, taking into account existing regulations in the EU member countries.

We demand a reinforcement of migrants’ rights to work wherever they live in the EU. A migration law should focus on migrants’ interests and not on the interests of companies that are looking for cheap labour, which forces millions of migrants to work in the black market. We reject any regulation or directive in the EU and its member countries imposing expulsion. What is needed is a regulation and a work permit for employment research.

We reject the Lisbon strategy concept of “Flexicurity”. Our priorities are steps against poverty, social marginalization and precariousness, for full employment in regular jobs, increasing wages, pensions and social allowances. Taxes must be raised both on income and capital, allowing redistribution from the top to the bottom.

Education, child care, and care in adolescence, illness and old age, health, water supply and sewage disposal, energy supply, public transport, postal services, culture and mass sport are not commercial goods but public services belonging to state responsibility. Therefore, they must not be subject to competition for the lowest costs and highest profits. We want no more privatisation of public services and goods but a reversal or conversion into public property. We are for strong public services, publicly controlled companies and more investment in education, nursing and health care, public transport, culture and sport.

For us climate and social questions are linked. Therefore the current financial and economic crises cannot be separated from the challenges of climate change and a reorientation of our ways of production and consumption. We are in favour of the immediate and consistent development of a new international treaty according to the 4th report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and of sticking to the EU action plan 2007-2009. We demand the full implementation of the signed and promised obligations of the EU in all fields of climate and energy policies. The following compromises represent the minimum for the implementation of all climate protection commitments already signed:

  • Reduce global emissions by 30% by 2020 on the exit level of 1990 and by at least 80% by 2050.
  • Increase the use of renewable energy by at least 25% by 2020
  • Reduce total primary energy consumption by 25% by 2020 and increase energy efficiency by two percent per year, including a limit of per capita consumption.
  • An efficiency obligation needs to be introduced for industry and the producers of energy-intensive goods.
  • The EU framework subsidies are to be limited consequently to the sector of energy efficiency and renewable energies.

We are against the reduction of the Kyoto Protocol to a market system of quota emissions. It is necessary, in order to conclude the Kyoto 2 treaty, to have a new comprehensive strategy that allows the reduction of emissions making the development fairer and more sober. A new paradigm based on cooperation, instead of competition, is needed, starting with technology transfer to developing countries, the funding of clean technologies and policies of adjustment to climate change.

Water is a universal good and the access to it must be guaranteed as human right.

The protection of nature and the development of renewable resources, the transformation of our landscapes, as well as secure food supply are existential challenges. We demand agreement on the highest environmental standards within the EU and contributions to saving biodiversity for future generations (active steps for waste reduction, water protection, for replanting and desertification prevention policies, etc. must be included into strategies and policies, in particular in the fields of agriculture, energy and climate protection).

We strive for a substantial review of the EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). It must be directed at the right of people everywhere in the world to decide on their agricultural policy themselves by fully respecting the environment.

We oppose any reform of the EU Common Agricultural Policy that challenges public agricultural policies. We demand that agriculture must not be a matter of WTO negotiations and oppose agriculture becoming more and more a playing ground for neo-liberal actors and liberalisation measures worldwide. We support the request for food sovereignty.

This means giving priority to local agricultural production, quality food and no constraints on submitting the products to the world market. The access to land, seeds, water and credits must be regulated in a real land reform in Europe and the other continents.

We demand a comprehensive rural development policy: the development of agricultural production and employment opportunities should constitute the central criteria of the development of the countryside, with the application of sector-based policies, support of agricultural biodiversity and rural employment, particularly for young people and women. Subsidies should be given with economically, social and environmental criteria and not for the profit of big producers in certain sectors. Starting from that point the distribution of the CAP budget must be re-orientated in particular to the needs of rural areas, small-scale producers, disadvantaged and mountainous areas.

Agriculture in the 21st century must correspond to a multifunctional aspect: protection of plant multiplicative material, guaranteeing the right of farmers to have their own seeds, applying programs of development of organic agriculture and livestock farming and prohibiting the use of “genetically modified organisms” (GMO) in the production of foods and foodstuffs, defending and valorising the denomination origin as well in the non-European markets.

 

III. A peaceful and cooperative Europe

No war should ever start from Europe’s soil again. We do not consider war and militarization to be political instruments and want a strategy where security for all is granted.

Disarmament and conversion of military industries are pivotal tasks. We campaign against the rearmament provision of the Lisbon Treaty, not only because of the lethal and ecologically destructive weapons, but also because it detracts funds from economic, social and ecological development. The EU Defence Agency should be replaced by a disarmament agency designed to stop the arms race, proliferation and possession of weapons of mass destruction as well as the militarization of outer space and the oceans on the basis of disarmament agreements.

Emerging conflicts on the European continent – in particular after the refusal by governments to rethink the cooperation of all European states on an just and equal basis since 1990 – are pointing out the necessity of creating a new collective security system on the European continent. From a regional crisis to a war situation, the Caucasus conflict in August 2008 eventually became an international crisis that now involves the United States. We call civil society in Europe and the European Union to strive for a political solution. The danger of such conflicts spreading out into other European regions remains of topical relevance. At the same time, the deployment of NATO forces in Afghanistan and growing demands from US administration to increase the European participation there shows the failure of the military intervention strategy followed by the Bush administration. It demonstrates the growing contradiction between the European interest in security and the military intervention strategy and NATO expansion.

The European Left reaffirms its demand for the dissolution of NATO. We oppose the logic of military blocs, including attempts and policies for creating European military structures.

More than ever, security in Europe must be based on the principles of peace and security, disarmament and structural assault incapacity, conflict solution by political and civil means within the OSCE system, conforming to international law and to the principles of a reformed and democratised UN system. Such a collective and cooperative European system must guarantee security and unconditioned access to energy supply, environment, human rights issues, etc.

We need to stress the political, and not only military, negative role that NATO plays according to US interests in Europe. Even after the end of the East-West bloc confrontation NATO remained, and was developed into an even more functional tool of the US administrations for their hegemonic strategies. The NATO enlargement to the East corresponds to this logic.

The bilateral agreements of the United States with various European countries, like the one with Italy for the Vicenza US military base, with Poland and the Czech Republic for deploying US missile defence systems, and those with Bulgaria and Romania for new bases not only represent a threat to Europe’s sovereignty, but create the real risk of a new confrontation in Europe.

The withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan of NATO troops and the Western coalition led by the United States is necessary. The international community as well as the EU must support Afghanistan’s population in finding a political solution through non-military ways on the basis of the respect of international law and human rights. As further measures we demand the closing of all NATO and US bases in Europe. We are against the US (or any European) Satellite Defence Installations with European and non-European deployments, and fully support the Czech, Polish, Bulgarian and Romanian citizens who fight against them. We reject any military misuse of the European Galileo System.

The development and trade policies of the EU must meet the Millennium Development Goals in reality and must realign to the principle of equality of all countries. The bilateral European Partnership Agreements are the wrong way. The international trade policy of the EU is to be measured by giving adequate answers for solving global social and ecological problems. The fight against still growing global poverty and imbalances must be put at the focus of development cooperation – the misuse of development cooperation for continuing a kind of colonial relations, for the one-sided support of export industries in favour of European enterprises, or as a geopolitical instrument must be stopped. We want a ban on the transformation of food into fuel. We demand debt redemption for the poorest countries of the world and the revision of the structural adjustment programmes of the World Bank and IMF.

We support a further development of Mediterranean cooperation. It is the key for achieving peace and security in the Middle East. We need the active participation of all political forces and civil societies in the countries involved. The democratic and transparent process must bridge the gap between countries to the North and South of the Mediterranean. This is the only way to avoid turning the ambitious political project of the Mediterranean Union into a political structure of inequality.

A Mediterranean of lasting and stable peace is impossible without solving the conflict in the Middle East. The essential precondition for that is recognizing and realizing the right of the Palestinian people to have an independent, viable state side by side with the state of Israel – with equal rights and living together in a peaceful neighbourhood. The EL will do its utmost to demand and to push the EU and its member countries to act consistently in that direction. Europe needs to emancipate itself from the US “Greater Middle East” plan, to engage itself actively for an end of the military occupation of the Palestinian territories, for the removal of the “Wall” according to the Advisory Opinion of the International Criminal Court, and for the strict fulfilment of all corresponding UN resolutions. The EU must take more political steps to request the support of the Arab countries in the region and to stimulate the growing civil societies’ awareness of working towards an active conflict-solving policy. The European Left refuses the course of US and EU confrontation policies towards Iran – in particular regarding the solution of the nuclear energy use conflict - and demands strict political negotiations. The EL expresses its solidarity with political and social forces striving for the consistent implementation and guaranteeing of human rights in Iran.

The European Left stresses its commitment to a process of security and cooperation of all states in the Mediterranean and Middle East region(s), including the right of the Sahrawi people to self-determination on the basis of the existing UN-resolutions 1754 and 1783. We are refusing any policy of confrontation vis à vis Iran while demanding the implementation of human rights for all people in that country.

Turkey must respect in a legally binding way the political and human rights for all people living in the country, including all minorities. It must carry out social and legal reforms in accordance with the rule of law to pave a democratic and peaceful way for all Kurdish citizens in Turkey. This will also contribute to a political solution for the Kurdish people in other countries of the Middle East.

The significant mobility on the Cyprus problem and the change of climate after the election of Dmitris Christofias to the presidency of the Republic opens up new hopeful prospects regarding the efforts for the reunification of the island. The conduct of official negotiations between the leaders of the two communities under UN auspices should lead to a bi-zonal, bi-communal federal solution with political equality, as stated in the relevant UN Resolutions, and on the basis of the High-Level Agreements, international and European law.

The European Left favours the creation of all political and economic conditions for a peaceful coexistence of the European peoples and states. Europe needs an economic and social space which does not exclude any European country and which is based on a varied bi- and multilateral system of agreements. The EL stands for the further enlargement of the European Union and for a stable All-European structure to overcome still existing political and economic divisions in Europe. For that the EL supports in particular the preservations of democratic governance, of guaranteeing and realizing human rights for all people in daily practice, of respecting and protecting minorities and the state of law as important preconditions for negotiating with countries applying for EU membership. The EU itself must be made politically and economically ready for further enlargement steps as well.

The European Left demands the consistent implementation of the EU’s new neighbourhood policy on the basis of equality, in particular regarding the CIS countries and the Western Balkan states.

 

IV. A democratic and equal Europe

The democratic reconstruction of Europe remains an urgent task of today.

All human beings living in EU member states have the right to participate in the shaping of the EU and its future development, whether born there or not. The European Union must open up to the democratic participation of all people, or it will have no future.

We stand for the strengthening of individual rights and freedom rights as well as the fundamental social and political rights of all people living in the EU. The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights must become legally binding and be further developed. The EU should join the ECHR Charter. The EL stands for guaranteeing full equality of women and men in all aspects of life. We strive for a European regulation guaranteeing the right of women to decide on their bodies, free contraception and abortion within the public health system. We promote European regulations criminalizing any gender violence. Sufficient material and personal resources are to be provided to all victims of such violence.

The European Union must protect and promote the rights of those discriminated against because of their ethnic origin, sexual orientation and gender identity, religion, ideology, disability and age. We demand the respect of all minority rights and consistent action against racism, xenophobia, ultra-nationalism, chauvinism, fascism, anti-communism, homophobia and any other form of discrimination. We are in favour of a secular Europe in the sense that all the states’ policies be secular.

The Europe we want needs a democratisation of the economy. Coalition, co-determination and strike rights must apply across borders. We reject the subordination of social and Trade Union standards to the basic freedoms of the single market, as ruled by the European Court of Justice. On the contrary: the rights and opportunities for working people to participate in management decisions, for example on investments or production regulation, must be enlarged and fixed by law.

The EL stands for an EU cultural policy based on intercultural dialogue and education. It resists the unlimited liberalisation of cultural services. We want the dialogue of the cultures to become a pacifist policy principle at local and European levels. We support the UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, in which the preservation and promotion of the diversity of regional cultures is binding under international law.

We also demand a transparent media policy. The sources of economic productivity, cultural hegemony and political as well as military power are increasingly dependent on the production, storage and conversion of information and knowledge. Therefore the access to societies’ communication and information, and their acquisition, are essential issues of democratic participation both at national and European levels. Furthermore the democratisation of production, treatment and appropriation of information and knowledge is inevitably needed to challenge digital capitalism. We are in favour of democratic structures of public service Media, with cheap and easy access to modern cultural arenas like the internet, free codes and programming without the unlawful use of social networks and personal data.

It is necessary to reverse the Bologna Process, the subordination of the school, university and research needs to the interests of private industries, the profit-makers of the free market. Education is a human right. We support all movements of students, parents and teachers in Europe who oppose the Bologna reforms and defend, regardless of the country, a public and free education.

European public education needs be rooted in the principles and values defining the essential features of European Culture. School must be, in all member states, a place of meeting and free confrontation among cultures coexisting in an ever more multi-cultural and multi-religious society, as necessary premise of the authentic development of an education in peace and gender equality. At the same time universities need to be put in the condition to develop their prominent role of cultural and scientific training unlinked to market logic.

To reclaim the political space in the European Union for all people living here, the European Parliament must be given the power of legislative initiative. Direct participation in the European decision-making process, like the Citizen-Agora introduced by EP, including referenda at EU and national levels on EU landmark decisions, must be possible. The EU institutions (Council, Commission and Parliament) must open up to the participation of civil societies, who should have the possibility to control their decisions. The EU-wide anti-terror measures and laws are to be abandoned. We want the abolition of the EU list of “terrorist organizations”, which jeopardises our freedom.

We want a cosmopolitan Europe open to migration. Not a Europe as a fortress that repels people in need. A common EU refugee and migration policy in accordance with the Geneva Convention is needed. People who flee from persecution because of their political commitment, ideology, religion, or sexual orientation must find protection and asylum in Europe. We demand the recognition of gender-related and non-governmental persecution as grounds for asylum and call for the specific protection of child refugees. Therefore, we reject the already existing FRONTEX-system of border controlling and demand the rejection of all plans on the implementation of the “Pact on Migration and Asylum” and the “Return Directive”. Detention prisons must be closed.

We oppose the choices of the EU and European governments, which impose mechanisms of “preventive repression” and “preventive filing of personal data-(Prym Treaty)”, create suspects and offer the judicial and police forces, private companies, every interested state, even the secret services, the right to use personal data through the biggest existing data base, under the pretext of the defence of public safety.

We, the parties of the European Left, campaign together and in our countries for these goals in the run-up to the 2009 elections to the European Parliament. We want a strong left parliamentary group in order to be able to change Europe. Each vote for a candidate of the European Left is a vote for a peaceful, social, ecological, democratic and feminist Europe living in solidarity!

 

Take your chance, change Europe now!


Související články:
(EU - Strana evropské levice)

Úvahy o budoucnosti evropské levice (04.06.2017)
V. sjezd Evropské levice, Berlín, 16.-18. 12. 2016 (18.12.2016)
Nedoľité pětasedmdesátiny (16.08.2016)
Naslouchat občanům (07.07.2016)
Zápisky z Letní univerzity Evropské levice (17.07.2015)
Letní univerzita EL se letos koná v České republice (16.05.2015)
Prohláąení Rady předsedů SEL - Atény, 14. března 2015 (08.04.2015)
Spojenectví proti úsporným opatřením = Alliance Against Austerity (08.04.2015)
TTIP: nebezpečí pro pracovní místa, bezpečnost potravin, ochranu přírody a demokracii (15.09.2014)
Letní univerzita Evropské levice je v Německu (19.06.2014)
Letní universita EL 2013 je minulostí (01.08.2013)
Léto je tady a s ním letní universita (11.07.2013)
Letní universita EL - praktické informace pro účastníky (13.06.2013)
Letní universita EL 2013 - předběžný program (13.06.2013)
Rámcový program - Letní univerzita EL, Portaria, Řecko (17.06.2012)
Strana evropské levice podporuje Evropský den odborářské aktivity (29.02.2012)
Národy Evropy, spojte se proti krizi! (21.02.2012)
Evropská levice odsuzuje policejní násilí proti demonstrantům v Barceloně (29.05.2011)
EL elects new President and vice-chairpersons (06.12.2010)
EL volí nového předsedu a místopředsedy (06.12.2010)
Agenda pro sociální Evropu (03.12.2010)
3. sjezd SEL (03.12.2010)
Výzva moldavského prezidenta k národu (09.04.2009)
Výrazný úspěch komunistů v Moldově (06.04.2009)
Společně pro změny v Evropě (18.12.2008)
Společně za změny v Evropě - o volební konferenci EL (01.12.2008)
Socialismus v Evropě: zkušenosti a poučení z 20. století a vyhlídky pro 21. století (02.10.2008)
Socialism in Europe: Experiences and Lessons from the 20th Century and Prospects for the 21st Century (02.10.2008)
Strana evropské levice (01.02.2008)
Česká televize: Dobrá zpráva - žádná zpráva? (05.12.2007)
Archiv tlumočeného videa z 2. sjezdu EL (04.12.2007)
Pražská akční výzva (29.11.2007)
Vybojovat změny v Evropě (29.11.2007)
Poděkování organizátorům 2. sjezdu EL (29.11.2007)
Evropská levice: vytváříme alternativy (28.11.2007)
2. sjezd EL - projevy a schválené dokumenty (28.11.2007)
Co je nejdůležitější (27.11.2007)
Buďme hnutím demokratické obnovy (27.11.2007)
Levice musí prokázat sílu své neosociální politiky (27.11.2007)
Levice musí najít společnou řeč (27.11.2007)
Pražská akční výzva "Mír, rozvoj a plnoprávné zaměstnání" (26.11.2007)
Evropská levice už ušla svůj kus cesty (26.11.2007)
Pár fotek z 2. sjezdu EL (26.11.2007)
Strana evropské levice nechce americké radary ani základny (25.11.2007)
Pozor, pravice a levice mají sjezd (25.11.2007)
Levicová vize o Evropě je ta pravá (23.11.2007)
Přímý přenos z 2. sjezdu EL (22.11.2007)
Evropská levice: vytváření alternativ (návrh) (17.11.2007)
Pozvánka na 2. sjezd Evropské levice (15.11.2007)
Základní informace o 2. sjezdu Strany evropské levice (EL) (15.11.2007)
Aktuální informace o Straně evropské levice (Evropská levice, EL) (15.11.2007)
Návrh programu 2. sjezdu EL (15.11.2007)
Seznam zahraničních účastníků 2. sjezdu strany EL (05.11.2007)
8. březen 2007: 50 let ženských práv v Evropské unie. Konzervativní nástup v "Roce stejných příležitostí 2007" (08.03.2007)
2. sjezd Strany evropské levice se sejde v Praze (21.01.2007)
Berlínská výzva (20.01.2007)
Strana evropské levice roste (10.03.2006)
Beitrag zur Debatte um die Gründung der PEL (27.11.2005)
Příspěvek k diskusi o založení SEL (27.11.2005)
Nový levicový obrat k Evropě (27.11.2005)
Rudá mezi evropskými hvězdami (27.11.2005)
The front against opportunism must be strengthened (11.11.2005)
Frontu proti oportunismu je třeba posílit (11.11.2005)
1. sjezd Strany evropské levice na stránkách SDS (06.11.2005)
Východoevropské strany nejsou dostatečně zastoupeny (05.11.2005)
Jaký smysl hledá KSČM v Straně evropské levice (05.11.2005)
Athens’ Declaration (03.11.2005)
Athénská deklarace (03.11.2005)
A new left turn for Europe (02.11.2005)
Přeměnit zálibu levice ve sporech na účinnou politiku (02.11.2005)
Úvodní projev na sjezdu SEL (01.11.2005)
SEL proti politice neoliberalismu (31.10.2005)
Sjezd SEL v českém agenturním zpravodajství (30.10.2005)
Projev na sjezdu SEL (neděle) (30.10.2005)
Projev předsedy ÚV KSČM na sjezdu SEL (29.10.2005)
Opening Speech of Fausto Bertinotti (29.10.2005)
Zahájení 1. sjezdu Strany evropské levice v Athénách (29.10.2005)
V Aténách zahájen sjezd SEL (29.10.2005)
Projev na sjezdu SEL (sobota) (29.10.2005)
Práce se závěry z evaluační zprávy, rozvoj EL a připomínky ke Stanovám EL (26.10.2005)
Předseda SDS ke sjezdu SEL v Aténách (26.10.2005)
Finanční statut Strany evropské levice (26.10.2005)
Evropa potřebuje zaměstnanost, sociální spravedlnost a rozvoj člověka. (26.10.2005)
Čeští komunisté podávají ruku SEL (22.10.2005)
Ano, můžeme změnit Evropu! (16.10.2005)
Postoj KS Řecka ke Straně evropské levice (03.10.2005)
Základní informace o 1. sjezdu Strany evropské levice (EL) (01.10.2005)
Základní informace o Straně evropské levice (EL) (01.10.2005)
KSČM ještě ladí svůj postoj ke stalinismu (12.09.2005)
Co je v zájmu evropské radikální levice (06.09.2005)
Několik poznámek ke Straně evropské levice (03.09.2005)
Rozhovor Haló novin s předsedou KS Rakouska Walterem Baierem (15.07.2005)
Proti vydání Sinana Bozkurta (19.03.2005)
Výzva Výkonného výboru Evropské levice k následkům katastrofy v jižní Asii (14.03.2005)
Stručná informace o jednání VV SEL (13.03.2005)
Mlha, nebo krátká paměť? (13.03.2005)
Diskuse VV SEL k dopisu KSČM (08.03.2005)
O XVII. sjezdu Německé komunistické strany (07.03.2005)
6. sjezd PRC - zápas o charakter strany (06.03.2005)
Pietro Ingrao vstupuje do Strany komunistické obnovy (04.03.2005)
Dopis delegátům 6. sjezdu PRC (03.03.2005)
Oznámení oddělení mezinárodních vztahů strany SYNASPISMOS stranám EL (23.02.2005)
Pravidla pro individuální členství (13.02.2005)
Strana, která rozdělila evropskou levici (11.02.2005)
Rok 2005 před námi (03.01.2005)
Rok Alberta Einsteina (31.12.2004)
Strana evropské levice (starý web) (01.12.2004)
Zápis ze schůze Výkonného výboru Strany evropské levice (EL), Paříž, 7. listopadu 2004 (07.11.2004)
K Evropské levici a evropské levici (27.10.2004)
Jiná Evropa je možná: NE ústavní smlouvě (25.10.2004)
Zápis schůze Výkonného výboru Strany evropské levice (EL), Berlín, 10.-11. července 2004 (11.07.2004)
Aby mohla být polemika fundovaná (06.06.2004)
Narodila se nová evropská levicová strana... A je to holčička (06.06.2004)
Tisková zpráva SDS 040603 (03.06.2004)
Mýtus či reálná spolupráce levice? (03.06.2004)
Informace o možnosti individuálního členství (02.06.2004)
Rozhodnutí o individuálním členství ve Straně evropské levice, platné pro Českou republiku (02.06.2004)
Poznámky ke sjezdu Strany evropské levice (11.05.2004)
Poznámky k překladu Stanov (09.05.2004)
Manifest Strany evropské levice (09.05.2004)
Stanovy Strany evropské levice (09.05.2004)
Výkonný výbor SEL (09.05.2004)
Tisková zpráva SDS 040509 (09.05.2004)
Tisková zpráva SDS 040425 (25.04.2004)
Stanovisko SDS k situaci v evropské levici před sjezdem SEL (18.04.2004)
To the arguments against the Party of the European Left (30.03.2004)
K argumentům proti Straně evropské levice (30.03.2004)
Stanovisko CV SDS k založení SEL a k volbám do EP (20.03.2004)
Postoj KS Řecka k založení Strany evropské levice (18.03.2004)

[Akt. známka (jako ve škole): 1,00 / Počet hlasů: 1] 1 2 3 4 5

Celý článek | Autor: administrator | Počet komentářů: 0 | Přidat komentář | Informační e-mailVytisknout článek

červené návěští   Hlavní zprávy červený nadpis

zelené návěští   Novinky zelený nadpis
16.04.2018: Letní univerzita Evropské levice 2018
Letní univerzita EL se koná ve dnech 11. aľ 15. července 2018 ve Vídni pod mottem "Dialog pro pokrok v Evropě. 200 let od narození Karla Marxe, 100 let od konce 1. světové války. Bliľąí informace o účastnickém poplatku a registrační formulář jsou k dispozici na stránkách Evropské levice.

16.06.2017: Opět útoky spamovacích robotů
Doąlo k opakovaným útokům robotů sázejících do komentářů texty s podivnými "inzeráty" (podle vąech známek činskými). Jen poslední dvě dávky představovaly více neľ 200 těchto pseudokomentářů, které maľeme.

16.06.2017: Někdo/něco zde krade ľ a ą?
V uplynulých dnech doąlo k technické závadě, v jejímľ důsledku se "beze stop" z některých článků (ale i z větąiny komentářů) ztratila vąechna písmena "ľ" a "ą" (nebo jenom jejich část). Za závadu se omlouváme a na jejím odstranění pracujeme (zatím pátráním po příčině).

09.05.2017: Pietní akt na Oląanech
Jako kaľdoročně, i letos poloľila 9. 5. v 9 hodin delegace zástupců CV SDS a výboru praľské organizace SDS květiny k památníku padlých rudoarmějců na oląanském hřbitově. Při té přileľitosti jsme pietně vzpomněli i padlých daląích armád (včetně československé), kteří jsou na Oląanech uloľeni.

červené návěští   Anketa červený nadpis
V současnosti rozvířil hladinu návrh přijmout do ČR 50 syrských válečných sirotků. Co si o něm myslíte?

V Sýrii ani ľádní váleční sirotci nejsou.
226 (226 hl.)
Nebrat! Jeątě by nás podřezávali.
226 (226 hl.)
Konečně někdo uvaľující lidsky.
169 (169 hl.)
A» se kaľdý stará o sebe, nic nám do nich není.
164 (164 hl.)
Je to sice politikum, ale krok správným směrem.
145 (145 hl.)
Raději bychom měli zvýąit svou ostudně nízkou rozvojovou pomoc.
173 (173 hl.)
Prohnilý humanismus !!
136 (136 hl.)

Celkem hlasovalo: 1239


zelené návěští   Vyhledávání zelený nadpis


na nových stránkách

Rozšířené vyhledávání
Tématické skupiny
Seznam autorů


Google

web
sds.cz
blisty.cz
bbc.co.uk

zelené návěští   Vaąe komentáře zelený nadpis
[15.05.2018 19:15:23]
josef mikovec
Bohumír ©meral - Mučedník ztracených a vysněných příleľitostí http://www.novarepublika.cz/2018/0 5/frantisek-ferdinand-s ...

[15.05.2018 18:54:53]
josef mikovec
Zde jest zkuąební kámen, na němľ se dokáľe, zdali jsme opravdu v dost zralí, dost socialističtí, abychom opravdu stali se v Rako ...

[21.03.2018 17:10:12]
n
Snad se něco doví,!

[19.11.2016 10:28:45]
l&s
Doplnění k Peroutkovi - Zemanův projev byl míněn dobře, bohuľel se v něm dopustil dehonestujícího přeąlapu, kdyľ prohlásil, ľe Per ...

[27.02.2016 10:01:56]
l&s
Článek pana Bělohradského není k dispozici, tak jen pár postřehů k této stati. Paní Neudorflová sice správně píše, že je chyba, k ...

[28.10.2015 09:08:14]
-ik
Dobrý den pane ©lemendo! To, co jste napsal, je konstatování stavu. A co navrhujete jako pokus o naznačení cesty? Já mysl ...

[04.09.2015 14:20:12]
n
Samozřejmě, ľe jiľ těąím na shromáľdění, jako posledně na Václaváku. Doufám, ľe nebude chybět pán ©afr, kterého tímto srdečně zvu. ...

[13.08.2015 13:11:01]
n
SDS leží v žaludku tomu zoufalému tapetáři, takže je moc známá a okolí se musí postarat o její prosazení. Prohra s US a tím i se s ...

[13.08.2015 01:44:03]
-ik
Jestli že se mi zdá, že militantní skupiny dosahují lepších výsledků, měl byc se podívat na sebe, zda nepracuji špatně. Oni mohou ...

[08.06.2015 21:05:37]
-ik
"význam evropské levice pro vývoj ve světě a její podíl na jeho spoluutváření (globalizace, přenos zkušeností z jiných čá ...

[25.05.2015 14:58:27]
n
Lidstvo v rozvinutých zemích a tím myslím i naąi zemi, jiľ dosáhli hranic daląího materiálního pokroku a jeho daląí zvyąování je n ...

[25.05.2015 08:21:23]
l&s
"Proč se myšlenka lidové fronty boje proti fašismu prosadila v našem hnutí, až když bylo fakticky pozdě? Bylo vůbec možné, ab ...

[13.05.2015 09:45:10]
Milan Neubert
-iku, napsal jste víc věcí, s řadou souhlasím. Jednu námitku ale mám: dospěli jsme k závěru, že virtuální diskuse na webu nebo na ...

[10.05.2015 23:25:51]
-ik
Mám pocit, pane Neuberte, že jste se o kontakt s lidmi ani moc nesnažil. Diskuse na stránkách SDS je nulová. A i v minulosti jst ...

[06.05.2015 10:38:48]
n
Vítám tapetáře. Čest tvoji práci. Podle množství zbytečné práce opravdu stojíš ...


Teze programu SDS
Teze programu SDS

Tyto stránky byly vytvořen prostřednictvím redakčního systému phpRS.